Thursday, November 15, 2018
Breaking News
Home » Environment » Due West: By Dan Whipple » Who Were the First Americans?
Clovis points from various sites in North America (Image courtesy of the Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University)

Who Were the First Americans?

There is a petroglyph panel in northern Wyoming has been reliably dated by archaeologists to about 12,400 years before the present. This makes it a very early record of human habitation in the American West.

And not long ago, you could have said that it was among the very earliest records of people living in the Rockies. For about 60 years, researchers have believed that humans known as the Clovis peoples migrated from Asia via the Bering land bridge and settled in North America, gradually working their way down into South America, incidentally driving the Pleistocene giants like the mammoth and mastodon to extinction along the way.

But this week researchers have published new carbon dates of Clovis sites that indicate that the Clovis cultures arrived about 11,050 years ago and survived only until about 10,900 years before the present. These new dates, which overturn wisdom about the peopling of America accepted since 1950, means that humans very likely inhabited the continent long before the Clovis.

This in turn means that the family trees of today’s Indian tribes will have to be rewritten. Clovis peoples probably were not the progenitors of all later Native Americans, as previous research has long maintained. It may also mean that the verdict of “not guilty” can be returned on the charge against the Clovis of killing off the Pleistocene giants.

Some Native Americans claim that they have “always” inhabited the continent, an idea that conflicts with the available evidence. But this new evidence helps to push back the dates of habitation much further, getting a little closer to always.

Texas A&M University anthropologist Michael Waters and Thomas Stafford of Lafayette, Colorado’s Stafford Research Laboratories used very precise carbon-14 dating of Clovis sites to determine when they were occupied. The refined technology allows dating of the sites to within 30 years plus or minus, compared with a margin of error of 250 years using older techniques.

“I think this paper does basically provide the final nail in the ‘Clovis first’ coffin,” Waters said in an interview.

Previous hypotheses have had the Clovis peoples crossing the Bering land bridge into Alaska, then gradually peopling the Americas as far as Tierra del Fuego in South America over a few millennia.

But the Waters and Stafford work shows that there simply wasn’t enough time to traverse and colonize that much territory. That means that some other people must have been prior to the Clovis, perhaps as long ago as 25,000 years before the present. These earlier people could have come via the Bering land bridge, or by sea, on routes that hugged the islands and shores of Asia and Alaska as much as possible. At the time, this route would have had many sea mammals that could have provided food.

“With this new data we shown that the Clovis time period is only about 200 years, a maximum of 20 human generations. If people were coming into a new continent, into a strange land,” Waters says. “They would have had to adapt to the hardwood and coniferous forests, to the grasslands and deserts. Every place had different plants and animals they would have had to learn to exploit. You have to find the materials to survive.”

But instead the Clovis peoples apparently settled into the North American landscape. “They knew how to exploit these environments quite effectively.”

Clovis is often referred to as a culture, but in fact it is characterized primarily by its technology. They used stone, bone and ivory to make tools, including the famous Clovis point for hunting with spear and atlatl, as well as other tools like scrapers for cleaning hides, punches, and adzes for chopping wood. They also used ivory from mammoths and mastodons to make projectile points.

Most of the known Clovis sites are in the Rockies, especially in Montana, Wyoming, Arizona and Colorado. “It’s a very distinctive technology,” Waters says, “We only find it in the 48 contiguous U.S. states and sometimes in Mexico.” But once about 100 miles south of the current U.S.-Mexico border, Clovis technology virtually disappears.

Modern genetic research indicates that the first people to come to the two Americas originated in northeast Asia about 25,000 to 20,000 years ago. Most genetic studies are converging on a homeland near the border of Russian and Mongolia or Russia and China. They either came before the last glacial maximum (about 20,000 years ago), or they came after the glaciers began to recede, about 13,500 years ago. In between the two periods, ice two miles thick covered the northern hemisphere as far south as the Great Lakes and the Tetons, making travel difficult, at least.

But it seems likely now that people were on the continent prior to 13,500 years ago. At the Mud Lake site in Wisconsin, there is evidence of human butchering of mammoth remains. There is strong evidence from a site called Cactus Hill in Virginia that people were living there 16,000 years ago.

Some researchers believe that the improved hunting technology introduced by the Clovis peoples resulted in the extinction of the large Pleistocene mammals that had previously inhabited North and South America. In addition to mammoths and mastodons, there were giant beavers, giant sloths, and the famous saber-toothed tiger. The end of the proboscidians can be dated fairly precisely, at around 11,000 to 10,900 years before the present.

But says Waters, “Most of the Pleistocene mammals may have been extinct before Clovis ever shows up. There were dwindling herds of mammoth and mastodon … Clearly Clovis were hunting these animals, but it’s not a blitzkrieg of extinction.”

After the Clovis arrived, the climate in North America changed dramatically, getting cold again, then warming into the climate regime we live in today. The Clovis people adapted to those changes. On the plains, where game was abundant, they became the Folsom people.

“We need to stop thinking of the peopling of the Americas a single event, along with the ruling paradigm of the ‘Clovis first’ model,” Waters says.

“It is highly improbable that within 200 to 350 calendar years, people entered North America; adapted to biomes ranging from artic tundra to grasslands, deserts, and rainforests; increased in population; and reached the southern tip of South America within the span of 10 to 18 human generations. This suggests that human populations already existed in the New World before Clovis.”

The Waters and Stafford work was published in the journal Science of February 23, 2007.

About Dan Whipple

Check Also

Yellowstone National Park’s Underground Power Plant

The 30-mile-by-45-mile volcanic caldera that makes up most of Yellowstone National Park erupts with disturbing regularity -- every 650,000 years or so. It erupted 2 million years ago, then again 1.3 million years ago. Then about 642,000 years ago it exploded again, with 1,000 times the force of the 1980 Mt. St. Helens eruption. Even that cataclysm pales in comparison to the two-million-years-ago event, which ejected 1,500 cubic miles of rock into the atmosphere. That’s a cube of rock and dirt eleven-and-a-half miles on each side. Waist-high layers of tuff from that eruption have been found in Iowa, nearly a thousand miles away. By way of comparison, Mt. St. Helens ejected 0.3 cubic miles of material. That’s a cube of material about two-thirds of a mile (or about 3,500 feet) on each side. Let’s see, a quick calculation: an eruption every 650,000 years; last eruption 642,000 years ago; next eruption due -- the day after tomorrow, QED.


  1. Me, I’ll stick with Spiritually and call carbon dating and scientific conclusions just knowledge of man.
    Divine Wisdom revealed from YHWH (God).

    Divine Providence unveils to us “For a Day is a thousand years (1000) and a Thousand years be but just One (1) day!!
    Educators, Put that in your Science manuels of 2007!!
    Anybody seen my pitchfork?

  2. educators: teach colonel bain grammar and how to spell
    “spiritually” should be spirituality and “manuels” should be manuals

    Science takes as its basis empirical, repeatable observations of the natural world, and thus generally regards ideas that rely on supernatural forces for an explanation as beyond the purview of science. Scientists regard ideas which present themselves as scientific, but which rely on a supernatural force for an explanation, as religious rather than scientific; and may label such ideas as pseudo-science. In this context scientists may oppose spirituality, at least in the scientific sphere.

  3. Darwin, if I received an Iguana ever time I heard that I would have to take my Clovis tools and go kill something to feed them all. Your Solutrean genetics are showing. 😉

  4. Craig: I thought the Solutreans somehow beat the Clovis folks and others to our shores, based on the latest DNA work. Then the thought that crossed my mind was that Clovis has been trumped by better science, after 50 or more years, so how much faith should I put in global warming scenarios? Take away the sun, and it all can be measured, and models made. Add the vagaries of solar influence, and tilt and aspect, oscillation, sun sports, solar flare ups, and we don’t know the questions yet, let alone the answers. I wonder if global warming is some sort of re-creation of Aztec or Inca sun worship based on human sacrifice. Or, is it, as my more cynical friend maintains, a chance for the upcoming Democrat majority to tax the heck out of energy, in the name of conservation for the public good, to fund yet another “great society” , one saved from certain fossil fuel destruction by their wisdom and judicious monetary punishment of evil energy users. Of course, without energy use, their funding dries up and their sorcerers will look for another spring of greenbacks. A money tree ripe to be picked. Idea: tax entertainment and entertainers to the degree they want to tax me to watch them.

    Forests are burning because our predecessors on this land had achieved a balanced heritage forest regime created by their frequent, directed burnings, reducing fuels to a manageable state. They managed not for the size of trees, but for the open ground under the trees. That is where their sustanence came from. We have failed to replicate their efforts, and fires have gotten more intense, covering more of the landscape just because of the new, human allowed fuel build up. No other reason. To understand this, you have to accept the early people did more than just kill large animals, had a more varied diet than mammoth meat. Those omnivores were crop cultivation pros when folks from across the Atlantic arrived, on fire cleared land.

    The insanity of our present predicament is that less controlled burning is allowed because it is assumed to add to global warming, or worse, the urban majority does not like the inconvenience. The result is more burning occurs as wildfires grow in frequency and extent. Now the Feds are forest fire broke, and are saying they will fight far fewer fires. You have to wonder what the process was and who made fire decisions 11,000 years ago. Or 600 years ago.

    Descartes was about doubting, and you can doubt science, but the very process of carbon dating ensures human fire in our history. I now have to wonder if all the fire history, fire science, will be ignored to placate the urban feel-good crowd in their pursuit of a free wildland recreational entitlement. Clovis or Solutrean, they were all burning to be able to exist. Why aren’t we?

  5. Bearbait, as Shakespeare said:

    To be or not to be, that is the question:
    Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
    The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
    Or to take arms against a sea of troubles
    And by opposing, end them

    As to the urban feel-good crowd will you be watching the Golden Calf awards with bear bated breath in anticipation of a presidential candidacy announcement as his crown, orb and scepter are presented?

  6. Craig…yeah..I watched part of it. Told the good wife the global warming song would win an oscar for its alternative lifestyle writer and I was right. Told her the algore documentary was ordained and blessed. I was right. Movies, and that industry, are not about art, but artfully presented politics..or at least their achievement forum is. You have to wonder if algore was cheered in Rapid City while the 4th major blizzard of the season ripped through the midwest.

  7. Actually there are more Clovis sites in the east and southeast than in the Rocky Mountains. The ‘big river’ country (Ohio R etc.) has many.

  8. i like you