What's New in the New West
You are here: Home » New West Network Topics » Energy » Open Letter to Montana Governor Regarding Keystone XL Pipeline

Open Letter to Montana Governor Regarding Keystone XL Pipeline

Dear Governor Schweitzer:

The Exxon pipeline rupture shows that pipeline leaks can and do happen, and that it is a disaster when landowners, emergency responders and community officials are not adequately prepared for such an occurrence. We are landowners along the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route and downstream from the Missouri and Yellowstone river crossings who are concerned about the impact that another spill would have on our families’ health, water quality, and ability to make a living on the land in Montana.

The Keystone XL will be nine times the size of the Exxon pipeline which recently ruptured – with exponentially larger impacts should there be a spill. The Keystone I pipeline, which runs through North Dakota, has had 12 leaks in its first year of operation. Because the Keystone XL pipeline needs a permit from the state of Montana, we call on YOU to protect Montanans along the Yellowstone and Missouri rivers by:

  • Requiring that TransCanada provide a comprehensive Emergency Response Plan for public review prior to issuance of a permit;
  • Requiring that all disturbed land be reclaimed, in consultation with soil scientists familiar with the region;
  • Requiring a comprehensive engineering study of pipeline pressures and worst-case spill risks specific to KXL;
  • Requiring that if a person’s water supply is contaminated by construction or pipeline operation, all costs associated with finding and providing a permanent water supply of comparable quality and quantity be covered, as well as any other damages, including but not limited to any consequences, medical or otherwise, related to water contamination;
  • Requiring that the pipeline bear liability for surface and water damage;
  • Requiring that all hydrologically sensitive areas are identified and a plan is implemented to protect them;
  • Requiring a certificate specifying which government agency will oversee all construction activities in Montana.We have valid reasons for our concerns about the Keystone XL pipeline:

    Despite its many assurances, TransCanada’s Keystone I pipeline produced 12 spills in its first year of operation.

    Tar sands oil is a corrosive material. The overall Alberta pipeline system that carries tar sands oil has had approximately sixteen times as many spills due to internal corrosion than the U.S. system.

    The Keystone pipeline is a 36-inch pipeline, and will have a transport capacity of up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day – 20 times more than the ExxonMobil pipeline.

    The Keystone pipeline is routed to cross the Missouri and Yellowstone Rivers.

    Governor, you have an opportunity to make TransCanada build their Keystone XL tar sands pipeline to the highest level of safety and quality standard possible. Assurances are not enough. We are glad that you have made it your cause to make Exxon fix the mess, but there is some damage that won’t ever be fixed. The best medicine is preventative and it is time to be preventative on the Keystone XL pipeline.

    Farmers, ranchers, and other landowners along the route of the Keystone XL pipeline have been treated like we are just in the way. We wish it did not take a disaster like the Exxon spill on the Yellowstone River to show that our concerns are valid and should be taken seriously.

    The risks are real, and the impacts of a failure are real. We need to start taking those risks seriously instead of accepting the standard reassurances that everything will be OK. The permitting process for Keystone XL is currently in progress, and you are in a position to prevent a disaster from Keystone XL. Please use your position toward that end.

    Signed,

    Darrell Garoutte

    Chair of Northern Plains Pipeline Landowners Group

    Tim Hess
    Representative Committee member of Northern Plains Pipeline Landowner Group, and landowner near Yellowstone River.

    Doris Frost
    Member of Northern Plains Pipeline Landowners Group and landowner near Yellowstone River.

About Guest Writer

Comments

  1. Claudette Ross says:

    I wouldn’t agree with Commissionor Otlund’s description of Exxon’s response as being worthy of “recognition and emulation” Nor do I agree they have demonstrated a “high level of professionalism and attention to detail” To wit: Exxon has adjusted: added to, the time it took to stop the spill-without adjusting their earlier estimates of how much oil was spilled. They did not divulge that the pipeline has carried tar sands oil, which, because of it’s highly corrosive nature, may have contributed to the break, and they won’t release a list of the chemical composition of the oil-leaving landowners waiting to hear what they and their property have been exposed to.

    Gov. Schweitzer has also expressed frustration with Exxon’s actions and lack of transparency and their role in the command center.

    Sen. Ed Walker would be expected to support Exxon; they contributed to his campaign.

    Please, lets stick with the facts.

  2. Ron Buss says:

    An oil company’s modus operandi is to do as little as possible to make as much profit as possible. They do the risk management needed to see whether it is cheaper to prevent accidents from happening or just wait for the them to happen – Guess which one they pick. Being dishonest with the parties, who will be affected, is the way of bussiness for them. Should we expect anymore from people with that much power?

Scroll To Top