What's New in the New West
You are here: Home » New West Network Topics » Travel & Outdoors » Montana and Colorado Get Big Grants to Protect Fish and Ferrets

Montana and Colorado Get Big Grants to Protect Fish and Ferrets

Among more than $53 million in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service grants announced last evening to help protect habitat for threatened and endangered species, Montana was a big winner for native fish, while Colorado was awarded substantial funding to reintroduce the extremely rare black-footed ferret to a safe place.

Montana’s Stimson Forestlands Conservation Project in Missoula County will receive $4 million to fund a conservation easement of more than 9,300 forested acres. The land, adjacent to another easement of 18,700 acres, continues a landscape-scale conservation effort of several years in northwestern Montana aimed at protecting bull trout, Columbia redband trout, mountain whitefish, pygmy whitefish, and westslope cutthroat.

In northwestern Colorado’s Moffat County, $469,540 was awarded for 15,156 acres of the Tuttle Ranch Conservation Easement, which includes a large white-tailed prairie dog complex considered an essential component of the federally endangered black-footed ferret’s habitat.

The ferret’s main prey is the prairie dog, much of whose habitat has been lost through grassland conversion, rodenticide use, diseases, and lack of active management, according to a FWS action plan document.

Of the 48 projects in 17 states that received funding, the Montana grant was the fourth-highest sum awarded.

That money is intended to ensure the availability of high quality riparian and instream habitat, by protecting Stimson Forestlands from development considered to be imminent.

Because of the area’s accessibility in Montana’s northwest corner near Troy, its stunning views, and gently sloping terrain, it is highly vulnerable to subdivision and development, according to the Trust for Public Land.

The funding also is meant to help maintain connectivity between lake, river, and stream systems in the Lake Creek drainage and help native fish species’ adaptation to the effects of climate change, so fish can move to more suitable habitats as water temperatures increase and flow regimes change.

In Colorado, securing the Tuttle Ranch easement “will serve as the catalyst to initiate black-footed ferret reintroduction on this parcel,” a FWS press release stated. “This project will be a model of incentive-based conservation, highlighting how both endangered species management and an active and profitable agricultural operation can coexist.”

The black-footed ferret, the only ferret native to North America, was considered the rarest mammal on the continent roughly a decade ago, before a federal reintroduction program was started in several states, including Colorado, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming.

The Tuttle Ranch easement also is intended to protect habitat, including a known active lek for greater sage-grouse, and numerous other species identified in the Colorado Wildlife Action Plan as “of greatest conservation need.”

Permanent protection of the property will help to conserve a landscape-scale ecosystem “with wildlife populations rivaled by few places in the United States,” the FWS release asserts.

The federal grants, authorized by the Endangered Species Act, were awarded through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (FWS) Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund.

They were divided into three categories of Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs), for land acquisition, planning assistance, and recovery.

HCPs are agreements that allow landowners to undertake activities that may impact listed species, when they agree to conservation measures designed to mitigate the impact of those actions. HCPs may also be developed by a county or state, and may address multiple species.

The Stimson Forestlands came under the category of a HCP land acquisition, while Tuttle Ranch’s grant was for planning assistance. Planning activities aimed at developing HCPs can include baseline surveys and inventories, document preparation, and outreach.

“Ensuring the survival of imperiled species depends on long-term partnerships and voluntary landowner participation,” said FWS Director Dan Ashe. “The vital funding provided by these grants empowers landowners and communities to safeguard habitat for threatened and endangered species and foster conservation stewardship efforts for future generations.”

The complete list of the 2011 grant awards under these programs is available here.

About New West Editor

Comments

  1. WyomingPocketGopherProtector says:

    Money well spent. Protecting endangered species protects land, water and air as well as other wildlife not yet listed. Some, of course, would rather have this money given to the richest people and land, water and air polluting corporations in the nation (in the form of more tax breaks).

  2. Todd says:

    Hmmmm, wonder why the United States of America is going belly up from overspending. Trust for Public land first showed up when they along with TNC were the recipients of the $500,000,000 dollars to buy Plum Creek.
    I guess if the feed enough prairie dogs ot the ferrets or decide that they need more prairie dogs another research grant or so will need to be funded out of our pockets and of course listing them on the ever expanding ESA.
    Oh well China can always use the oil and gas and coal and uranium that is off limits when they call their loans.

  3. bigsky says:

    Lotta truth in that, Todd.

    I remember the ferret project that I believe was tried in southern Wyoming. Since we had the wolf fiasco, those landowners who were primed and ready to accept ferrets backed out on the plan. Why create problems for yourself by allowing others to run your lives?

    Its to bad that helping speices today is going to be an uphill battle for all of these environmental extremist groups. Put the wrong people in charge and allow them to try to take people out of the equation and your project goes down the drain.

    To many lies and deceit in the process.

  4. Dave Schultz says:

    Glad to see continuing efforts to ensure habitat remains for listed species. It isn’t only the named species that benefits, of course. It’s easy for us as a society to get caught up in the crises of the moment and toss out the “non-essentials” in favor of preserving of corporate bottom lines. The country is not going broke. Big corps are doing extremely well. Finding win-wins for habitat partnerships are important tools that honor interests of everyone invilved.

Scroll To Top