What's New in the New West
You are here: Home » Rockies » Idaho » Boise » Idaho Republicans In Disarray

Idaho Republicans In Disarray

When there’s trouble in Idaho for Republicans, you know they’re hurting everywhere. We’ve already seen the grassroots revolt in the works on the part of Paul supporters. But the fissures in the Idaho party run deeper.

At the core of the party split is a fight over Idaho’s primary system between the state central committee and many elected officials.

The battle came to a head this week, causing one Idaho observer to take note of the strong contrast between a united Democratic party in Idaho, and the Republican infighting [sub. required]:

With Obama at the top of the ticket, Democrats head into what promises to be a very good year for their party in congressional and state races across the nation with reason for hope.

Meanwhile, Republicans are still feuding. Their state central committee, comprised of people elected locally, finally succeeded in forcing the party to sue a state government dominated by Republicans to require voters to go on record as Republicans before voting in party primaries. Statewide elected officials, GOP Chairman Kirk Sullivan and legislators had resisted both closed primaries and the lawsuit.

Monday, it appeared that resistance had not been fully overcome. Although the suit was filed a month earlier, it turned out state government had yet to be served with the paperwork, which would begin actual legal maneuvering. Worse, party officials gave differing reasons for the delay….

Is this conflict surprising? Not really. When any party has as large a majority as the Gem State GOP currently has, factions are bound to emerge, and eventually to collide. But this year in Idaho, Democrats have reason to give thanks that their own unity is not reflected in the party whose hold on power they intend to weaken.

The Democratic party is unified in Idaho, with a slate of legislative candidates that could be larger, but is still respectable. More importantly, they have two serious federal candidates in Walt Minnick (ID-01) and Larry LaRocco (ID-Sen), both of whom have been busy over the last few months criss-crossing the state to reach out to voters. There’s also the Obama factor–Idahoans turned out in historic numbers to give Obama nearly 80 percent of the caucus vote. With him at the top of the ticket in November, you’d think even Idaho Republicans would start paying a bit of attention to the mood of the populace.

Instead, the state’s leading candidates for federal office are displaying a degree of arrogance that would be surprising if it were coming anywhere but from Idaho Republicans. That arrogance has the potential to bite them with their own base. Both incumbent Rep. Bill Sali and leading Senate candidate Jim Risch are refusing to participate in primary debates.

Sali backed out of Sunday’s debate sponsored by the League of Women voters on Idaho Public Television–the only one broadcast statewide–because he “just couldn’t make it work in the schedule.” Likewise, front-running Senate candidate Jim Risch refused to participate in the primary debate on IPTV, because he “didn’t like the format, which allows for interplay between candidates that he fears could become negative.”

Instead, Risch chose to participate in a debate by the most favorable of Idaho’s media outlets, the NBC affiliate. Not only did they promise a format that was more to his liking–he wouldn’t be challenged by his challengers–they controlled the audience, keeping out other political reporters.

Among those barred were the Associated Press, an Idaho Statesman reporter and independent candidate Rex Rammell, who parked a campaign bus outside the 1,500-seat Swayne Auditorium.

Quary said KTVB News Director Jim Gilchriest told him to exclude from auditorium access anyone not the list. Quary said Gilchriest told him he was too busy to talk to a Statesman reporter, who arrived a half-hour early about covering the only scheduled debate featuring front-running Lt. Gov. Jim Risch.

So let’s review. The Republican party apparatus is at war with Republican elected officials. There’s a grassroots movement by Ron Paul supporters, who feel shut out of the party, to take over precinct committee seats. The two leading federal candidates have blown off their responsibility to their base constituents by refusing to debate their primary. For the icing on the cake, Jim Risch has made some powerful enemies by shutting out key Idaho political reporters.

The national Republican party in a microcosm, arrogant and out of touch. That’s a deadly combination in the face of a energized Democratic party and an electorate that’s demanding change. Even in Idaho.

Editor’s note: Joan McCarter’s weekly blogs are part of NewWest.Net/Politics’ “Diary of a Mad Voter” feature, a group blog, published in partnership with the Denver Post’s Politics West intended give a glimpse into the hearts and minds of several independent-minded voters and thinkers in the Rocky Mountain West in the ’08 election cycle. For more columns check in with www.newwest.net/madvoter. And for more information on each of the bloggers, click here.

About Joan McCarter

Joan McCarter is a contributing editor at Daily Kos, writing as "mcjoan." She has focused on Iraq, the traditional media, and electoral politics at the blog. During the 2006 election, McCarter focused her writing on Democratic prospects in the west. She traveled throughout the Rocky Mountain states through the last weeks of the campaign, researching and writing about Democratic candidates and campaign strategies. She is currently researching a book on western politics scheduled to be published in spring, 2008. McCarter worked on Capitol Hill for then Congressman and now Senator Ron Wyden. She has broad campaign experience and has been deeply involved in Democratic politics since childhood. She has a master's degree in international studies from the University of Washington and worked as a writer, editor, and instructional designer at the UW from 1995-2006. She is currently a fellow at Daily Kos.

Comments

  1. flounder says:

    To paraphrase the wingnuts:
    If you can’t stand up to the League of Women Voters, how can you possible stand up to al Qaeda?
    Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of extremists.

  2. Joan says:

    I don’t know flounder, those women voters can be pretty scary. Heh.

  3. John Bowery says:

    “There’s a grassroots movement by Ron Paul supporters, who feel shut out of the party, to take over precinct committee seats.”

    The Republican Party seems obsessed with marginalizing the “Ron Paul Republicans”. The entrenched GOP apparatchik claim that this is to promote party unity and that it is the duty of every “loyal” Republican to hold their nose and vote for McCain.

    As a loyal Republican, I find my party’s leaders reaction toward the Ron Paul supporters to be irrational bordering on psychotic.
    There have been well documented examples of GOP officials manipulating party rules to exclude blocks of new voters (Louisianna), county chairmen ignoring basic procedural rules at conventions and turning off microphones to silence dissenters (Texas, Maine, Georgia) and credentials committees applying ad hoc “loyalty tests” to disqualify large blocks of legally elected convention delegates (Missouri).

    Is it any wonder that we feel disaffected and frustrated to the point of rage?
    All that most of us want at this point is to have our (and Ron Paul’s) message of a smaller federal government and humble foreign policy in keeping with constitutional principles, heard and at the national convention.

    But apparently the GOP has sunk to the point where even voicing a contrary opinion is considered treason to the party. Especially when it questions the policies that have lead to a soaring national debt, an undeclared and no-win trillion dollar war in Iraq, collapsing dollar, soaring gasoline prices, and erosion of our constitutional rights.

    This is an attitude that I am afraid will prove to be disastrous to both the Republican Party and to our nation.

  4. Dave Skinner says:

    Sorry, Joan,
    But the Idaho Dems can be as united as they want. The only chance the party of the left may have is if the right “votes against” what is their establishment. When push comes to shove, that might not happen.
    Larry Craig may not sit right with a lot of folks, but he did, for the most part, vote right.
    And when it comes to making enemies in the media, that’s normal for conservatives and Republicans. Why pander to those who are just waiting for a slip of the lip?

  5. NH Republican says:

    I’d bet COL.[retd]A.M.Khajawall and all the other Obamaniacs are going to be quite sore when their guy wins and the only “change” we get is an increase in the amount of money the government steals out of our paychecks and an increase of attacks on what’s left of our constitutional liberties (can’t wait until he tries to institute the UN gun ban he’s proposed, should be fun watching all those people turning in their weapons- ammo first of course :-)

  6. Tom says:

    Joan, Can you say “Propaganda”?
    Sure you have a right to support whomever you want, but don’t try to pass this swill off as journalism.

  7. Jill Kuraitis says:

    Editor’s note: Joan’s columns are journalistic opinion and commentary, not reporting. There is a difference.

  8. Jay Kanta says:

    I notice that no one has mentioned that the Democrats have actually had much of the same “Ron Paul” movement within their ranks and came out much stronger. The Deaniacs, those that stuck with Dean through the scream and through his initial takeover of the DNC are well aware of how well an internal movement can redirect a party’s definition.

    Through Dean independent and individual donations have jumped up a massive amount and the usually overwhelming influence of the DCCC has been reduced to Rohm Emmanuel jerking off in front of Sunday morning talking heads and complaining that his own party has left him behind. Conservatives have a chance now to do the same thing, and have already started in some cases. Santorum, Delay, and now Boner are all being dismissed by large segments of the Republican party. How much longer until a “Ron Paul” type person takes charge of the internal workings of the Republican party and refocuses them onto really important things? The Republican party should kick the lobbyist connections out, distance themselves from the poisonous think tanks that have lied, manipulated and caused criminal negligence to take us to an invasion of another country?

    We need real fiscal conservatives to balance our government, to encourage reviews of spending, contracts and to encourage our system of checks and balances to work like it was meant to. As well, Conservatives need to back away from their “social conservative” brethren that are using government to recreate a culture of “separate and not equal”. Sali, for all his fiscal conservative intentions, is someone that deserves scorn and ridicule for his social intentions. There are plenty of other real Conservatives that could replace Sali and should.

    Maybe then I can see myself voting Republican again, but for now I’m waiting to see if they can stop talking to Gods and get back to talking to the people.

Scroll To Top