I’m many thousands of dollars in debt because I’m working toward my graduate degree in print journalism. Not online journalism, or multimedia journalism, or even photojournalism, but print — as in words, set in ink, which are put upon paper, don’t link to anything, don’t make noise, and can only be sent to a friend in conjunction with an envelope and a stamp.
Is the field I’m training for becoming obsolete? Is the fact that I’m writing these words for an online news site an answer to my own question?
While online journalism has some obvious advantages over print — speed, convenience, nifty slideshows — I still hold on to the hope, perhaps naively, that both mediums can find a way to peacefully coexist. Sometimes, I like flipping pages rather than scrolling down. Sometimes the computer screen hurts my eyes. Sometimes I like to read in the bathtub.
Monday evening I got some reassurance that the field of print media, while perhaps going through some tough times, hasn’t exactly gone the way of the typewriter.
Thomas Goetz, the deputy editor of Wired, came to Missoula to speak with NewWest.Net’s Jonathan Weber about technology, the evolution of the media business, and the separate niches for online and print publications. The NewWest.Net/Missoula event, held at the Missoula Art Museum and co-sponsored by Pyron Technologies, was attended by many in the Missoula journalism scene, including the dean of the University of Montana J-School, Peggy Kuhr.
Wired, in case you aren’t familiar with it, is both a print magazine and an online news site, both dealing with technology and how it relates to health, the environment, art, culture, and other aspects of our existence. 
One of the first questions Weber put to Goetz concerned one of “the obvious kind of anomalies of Wired.”
“[It’s] a print magazine about the things that are going to make print obsolete,” Weber said.
In his response, Goetz explained many of the reasons that Wired magazine works is that it does things that the online Wired cannot. For one thing, Goetz said, the magazine features a lot of long-form journalism — “two, and four, and six-thousand word stories” — that are more conducive to a print medium.
Another thing that keeps Wired magazine afloat (well, with a circulation of around 700,000 and an editorial staff of 40, it stays slightly more than afloat) is its visual layout. “We think of the magazine as an idea book,” Goetz said.
“We have a real emphasis on design. For us that has always been paramount.”
Weber then asked how the magazine manages to keep increasing its circulation while so many other print publications see theirs declining.
Goetz said that one of the ways Wired keeps so many loyal readers and continues to add new ones is that it does a good job of “filtering” information for its readers.
“It’s about what we include as well as what we exclude,” Goetz said.
Goetz then talked a bit about the Wired philosophy of storytelling and about how ideas eventually turn into layouts. One way that Wired likes to approach stories, Goetz said, is with a multi-disciplinary approach.
| Click here to download or stream audio from Goetz and Weber’s discussion. Audio courtesy of the Montana Web Designers and Developers Association. | |
“Actual innovation happens by crossing disciplines,” Goetz said. He used the example of biology and engineering, which of course combine to form bioengineering, a discipline Wired explored extensively in a piece on cellulosic ethanol that appeared in the October 2007 issue of the magazine.
Weber also wanted to know: How do Wired editors and reporters come up with such great story ideas?
Wired once ran a story, Goetz said, about a company that had come up with a process that could create synthetic diamonds. How did the reporter get the idea? By Googling “diamonds technology.” “Usually it’s not that easy,” Goetz joked.
Goetz, like anybody in the news world, knows all about the sometimes ugly business of courting sources to get a story, and one thing Wired does not do, Goetz said, is promise cover stories.
“As a journalist you do not want to be creating a release schedule for a product,” Goetz said.
Wired once lost a story about a big-blockbuster movie, Goetz said, because the magazine wanted a story about “the drones in the back office doing the CG [computer graphics]” and the Hollywood people wanted a big profile of the film’s star.
After a few more questions posed by Weber and a few from the audience, the crowd was left to mingle.
With his upbeat attitude and good sense of humor, Goetz had left me feeling good about the future of journalism — for about 30 seconds, that is. As I was happily making my way to the hors d’oeuvres table I stopped to chat for a minute with Dean Peggy Kuhr.
We started discussing my professional project — the J-School equivalent of a thesis — and she asked me if I was planning on making it into a multimedia project.
“Well,” I said sheepishly. “There’ll be photographs.”
“And what about audio?” she asked.
Audio?!
Editor’s note: By the way, if you’d like to listen to the audio of this event, click here to download or stream the mp3.
New West Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming
As a former 30-year veteran journalist, I’d say the last 20 of those years were a sad decline of independent newspapers, TV and radio stations into their current state of homogeneity, irrelevance and economic trouble. What’s great about the Internet is it’s an extension of talk radio: people talking and exchanging news with each other and without some intervening gatekeeper whose motivation is exploitation for financial gain. The democratization of technology made the Internet possible. But it was the abdication of responsibility by our mainstream media that turned the ‘net into what it is: a place where EVERY form of communication is legitimate and executed by intelligent, capable and versatile folks- most of whom aren’t even professionals. That being said, if you want to be a journalist, you’d better figure out “audio” while practicing writing. You’re going to need it.
Yeah, you just can’t take a laptop to the tub for a nice soak and quiet read.
Not sure about Goetz’ assertion that print is somehow amenable to long features — NYT Magazines seems to manage that just fine. What I like about Internet is there’s no space constraints and the opportunity to bring added value is almost unlimited — links to original documents or video feeds, links that allow the reader to do a quick skim of the surface or dive in deep.
As a 32-year journalism veteran, I’m torn between my Ludditte tendencies and my techno-envy of the latest toys and software programs. Within a year or two, I can envision going out the door for a story, equipped with digital video/still camera, recorder, laptop, cellphone and be able to report live, from any corner of the state — even mountain tops. If only my knees could be as high-tech.
Web journalism at the magazine level — whether it’s Wired or New West — seems to be doing well, and that’s great. What Montana and the rest of the West needs is more effort directed at local coverage. The Flathead Beacon shows that with sufficient talent and backing from some high-profile sugar daddies it can be done; might even turn a profit.
The absence of news competition over the decades has done some real harm — it should be of no surprise to anyone that it took an out-of-state reporter to break the story on asbestos deaths in Libby. Montana’s papers were either too lazy or too cowed by W.R. Grace to report the fact that scores of Montanans were dying.
My hope is that the Web will force some coverage of stories that “the powers that be” have in the past been able to quash. Blogging and chat rooms and unpaid “citizen journalists” will only get you so far. Asking reporters to be photographers and videographers and sound technicians will only insure that none of those jobs will be done very well. Some stories, like Libby, require time, talent, money and commitment.
The fact that Wired magazine has a circulation of 700,000, is stuffed with expensive ads, millions of Web and TV viewers and a paltry editorial staff of 40 does not bode well as a model.
Brodie: your comment about knees is right on. If it wasn’t for light weight cameras and other video gear, I’d be riding a desk in some newsroom right now. Instead, I run my own company specializing in non-fiction video for eco-friendly organizations- sort of my dream job. I read and watch more news than ever but haven’t bought a newspaper in years and rarely watch TV news. I think New West is a more legitimate journalism model for the future because it’s not only where the news junkies are- it’s where the future news junkies are. It’s not about video, writing or even stories. “The medium is the message” McLuhan said. You’ll note you and I aren’t conversing over TV, talk radio or in the letters to the editor. And as for John’s statement about the success of many local papers, particularly in the West, that has some to do with their media-deprived audience and more to do with relevance instead of pandering. Do they care about Britney in Bozeman?