What's New in the New West
You are here: Home » Rockies » Idaho » Boise » Sen. Craig Detached From Practical Solutions
Sen. Craig Detached From Practical Solutions

Sen. Craig Detached From Practical Solutions

Publisher’s note: This opinion piece is in response to Sen. Larry Craig’s (R-Idaho) opinion on the climate change conference.

Sen. Larry Craig got one thing right in his rambling attack on the United Nations climate change conference under way in Indonesia: “Reducing emissions need not be so painful.”

The senator is exactly right. Greenhouse gas emissions reductions needn’t be painful, but only if we have the kind of visionary leadership and ingenuity that have been lacking from him and the Administration over the past seven years. Moreover, if not for the roadblocks constantly thrown up by Mr. Craig and others in denial, Idaho would already be experiencing huge economic benefits associated with the clean energy businesses – benefits already being realized in other states in our region and across the country.

Mr. Craig’s partisan name-calling and his knee-jerk dismissal of views held by a majority of Idahoans shows how detached he has become from practical solutions to addressing climate issues. Some 190 nations are in Bali to begin crafting a new climate change protocol to replace the Kyoto agreement when it expires in 2012. Thanks to the startling lack of leadership from the U.S. government, the United States becomes ever more isolated in the face of irrefutable evidence demanding action.

The senator says his like-minded colleagues “Will do our best to discuss the real need to balance clean energy with our energy security.” He misses the point. Developing clean energy resources in this country actually enhances our energy security.

Mr. Craig says the United States “Has reduced the intensity of our emissions steadily during the last 7 years” by “using cleaner energy, not less energy, while growing our economy.” This disinformation trifecta ignores the fact that the United States’ total emissions continue to grow. And while we are gradually using cleaner energy, we could and should be using less energy per capita through conservation and efficiency measures. Developing low or zero-carbon renewable energy resources will grow our economy; and provide world leadership on this key issue. Craig is stuck in the past and devotes his reduced influence in the senate to protecting those who share his rear view mirror vision.

Mr. Craig asserts “Idaho continues to simultaneously lead the country in fewest greenhouse gas emissions emitted and lowest power rates paid.” True, Idaho has no coal-fired power plants. That’s because it imports electricity from dirty, greenhouse gas-emitting coal-fired plants in Nevada, Wyoming, and Oregon.

Idaho and our country have a bright energy future that does not require “suffering.” What we need is to shed the cynicism of those who would deny climate change. Mr. Craig should know better. Instead, we must make a serious, long-term commitment to a sustainable and affordable energy future for all.

So, do we want change, or not? Election 2008 is the time to move forward in a new direction with new leadership on alternative sources of energy. Idaho is well poised to make outstanding contributions in this arena. We can do it , Idaho.

Former Congressman Larry LaRocco is the Democratic candidate for the Senate seat currently held by Larry Craig.

About Larry LaRocco

Comments

  1. Cindy Kessler says:

    I can understand why Larry Craig would be in a state of denial about the grave situation we face regarding the climate since he lives on his own planet but why do so many seemingly smart people live in the same unrealistic place on our shared globe??? Keep up the good work!!!

  2. Casey says:

    Mr. LaRocco, I would appreciate hearing your perspective on the proposed nuclear energy site in Payette County, if you could state it here on NewWest. Thank you very much.

  3. Howard says:

    Thanks for your thoughtful comments on this issue and willingness to lead, Mr. LaRocco. It is THE issue of our times, and we need people running for office and in office recognizing and doing something about this issue. We all have our own parts to do, but without policy leadership we are doomed.

    Howard Gross
    Santa Fe, NM
    (formerly of Joshua Tree)

  4. Marion says:

    Which is more important, believing or actually cutting our use? If believing is all there is to it, fine, but if cutting back is the answer, can you guys explain why you support those who burn the global warming candle at both ends and the middle flying here, there, and everywhere?
    I really have a hard time believing that anyone like Mr. Gore is truly concerned wehn he has one of the biggest carbon footprints in the country. Wouldn’t it accomplish more if he parked his plane, sold his home for a homeless shelter and moved into a small house? I have a really hard time accepting that only those of us who already live frugal lives have to cut back further so there is more for the big users.

  5. Larry says:

    Casey: The proposed nuclear power facility in Payette County won’t be the last plant proposed for Idaho. It is so early in the planning stages that it is tough to assess at this point. I anticipate we will hear a great deal more from Payette residents. The lag time between concept and approval is so great that all sides will have the opportunity to comment and make a case for aproval or dispproval. The fate of the Sempra plant in Jerome County may give us a clue where local residents will come down on this proposal although the environmental considerations are different.

  6. Larry says:

    Marion: We had similar exchanges when I wrote about Al Gore’s star studded appearance in Boise to give present “An Inconvenient Truth.” I think you really need to re-focus on the true issues before us as a nation. The stories of Al Gore’s personal carbon footprint circulating in the blogosphere is a huge distraction from the true issue. I suggest you move on from your fascination with his demonization. There are bigger and more important issues to address. Thanks. larry

  7. Marion says:

    Larry, if global warming is an issue, then it would appear to me that doing what is necessary is an issue to. I am at a total loss to understand why obvious copious overuse by some of the firmest believers is a non issue, but everyone else simply mist sacrifice on the Global warming altar to the point of pain. What does it accomplish except to widen the gap between the haves and have nots?.
    I would liken Mr. Gore to a preacher who owned a combination bar, gambling den attached to a house of prostitution raking in the dough and telling his parishioners to go forth and sin no more. The hypocrisy is stunning, and it is even more stunning to see it defended so fiercely.

  8. bikeboy says:

    Larry (to Marion): The stories of Al Gore’s personal carbon footprint circulating in the blogosphere is a huge distraction from the true issue.

    Larry – who’s responsible for that huge distraction? And what is it distracting from?

    I’m with Marion. It is truly mind-boggling to see so many of the climate-change movers-and-shakers living very high-consumption personal lifestyles, scheduling their climate-change get-togethers at far-away tropical island resorts, etc. And to see their defenders rising indignantly if anybody questions those activities. (Defending the infallibility of Pope Al, I s’pose.)

    What is wrong with this picture?!?

    I’m trying to live the most energy-efficient lifestyle possible. But certainly not because I’m an Algore follower! The guy is a total hypocrite, and even the youngest children recognize, and respond negatively to, hypocrisy.

  9. Bennett Larsson Barr says:

    I once heard Larry Craig, at a Public Hearing, say that “the world is ran by people who show up”…

    So Bikeboy…you better build a pretty fast bike for Rev. Gore to get to all those conferences in far and away places to keep this KEY issue on the table…

  10. Marion says:

    Sorry, guys, but with the internet, tv, and the kind of phone services we now have, it is not necessary to fly to resorts to get the word out about global warming or anything else.
    Do you suppose they extended their stay in Bali this week because of the LACK of global warming back home???????

  11. John P. says:

    Why knit-pick how Al Gore lives and why use that as an excuse to live “fuelishly”? Never mind any controversy on climate change. Money saved on energy can be used to support other sectors of the economies of every nation, state, family, individual. Investing in more efficient products and developing policies that encourage their creation makes more sense that “business-as-usual.” Besides making the world a better/safer place to live, energy efficiency and building a self-sufficient production grid is the right thing to do for our great-grandkids and theirs. Sure, it’ll make the air cleaner and the planet a better place to live, but that’s a side benefit when I have more money to spend on food, housing and clothes for my kids.
    I get the impression that Mr. LaRocco thinks LONG-TERM when it comes to energy. Nice.

Scroll To Top